Ghost.Adventures.S06E02.HDTV.xvid-][ Peabody-Whitehead Mansion ]
- Type:
- Video > TV shows
- Files:
- 2
- Size:
- 345.25 MiB (362017552 Bytes)
- Spoken language(s):
- English
- Texted language(s):
- English
- Uploaded:
- 2012-03-17 08:18:54 GMT
- By:
-
psspss
- Seeders:
- 0
- Leechers:
- 1
- Comments
- 9
- Info Hash: 846948A3D9ED28B42F50ED0520726437612E5999
(Problems with magnets links are fixed by upgrading your torrent client!)
Ghost.Adventures.S06E02.HDTV.xvid-][ Peabody-Whitehead Mansion ][ 17-Mar-2012 ] avi converted TNEs mp4 source to xvid.. had some audio sync slipping in it.. espc nearer the end.. but I resync-ed and checked randomly all seems good to me again take it or leave it HELP SEED will be slow as I have other torrents from today seeding enjoy
| File list not available. |
psspss at 2012-03-17 13:01 CET:
tne said his source had audio problems theres
still some minor lip syncing I couldnt fix without
heaps of re-editing nearer the end of this xvid avi
its prob like 100ms out or less.. but then
its all in the dark and side views mostly :)
but i enjoyed this episode.. wasnt too bad
of an investigate
still some minor lip syncing I couldnt fix without
heaps of re-editing nearer the end of this xvid avi
its prob like 100ms out or less.. but then
its all in the dark and side views mostly :)
but i enjoyed this episode.. wasnt too bad
of an investigate
thanks for uploading this in xvid. It sucks that so many uploaders have gone to this abrupt shift to mkv format without apparently understanding that a lot of people use 360s and ps3s and all sorts of other devices to watch stuff on TV that will never ever be compatible with this format. I appreciate that it's a somewhat better format for certain things, but for TV shows I think it's kind of a dick move to just shift over to the newest, geekiest format just "because" when the previous format worked just fine. If it ain't broke, why fix it?
psspss at 2012-03-19 02:40 CET:
sadly some follow the pack and others like myself standout and stand firm
I have no issue if cappers make 720p mkvs but there
was no valid reason to reason convert tv shows to mp4 that benefited the wholw..
there reason if dont liek then convert it.. the problem with that even people like me cant be certain a recode of mp4 will turn out a nice xvid all the time when if they did it direct from there source it works better
I have no issue if cappers make 720p mkvs but there
was no valid reason to reason convert tv shows to mp4 that benefited the wholw..
there reason if dont liek then convert it.. the problem with that even people like me cant be certain a recode of mp4 will turn out a nice xvid all the time when if they did it direct from there source it works better
psspss at 2012-03-19 02:41 CET:
opps types.. eyes nto sure good ont his default
small font they use
small font they use
psspss at 2012-03-19 02:44 CET:
wish they had some commetn or torrent editor here. all these down times and no real improvements to the system
==
what I meant
sadly some follow the pack and others like myself standout and stand firm
I have no issue if cappers make 720p mkvs but there
was no valid reason or reason to convert tv shows to mp4 that benefited the wholw..
their reason if dont like then convert it yourself.. the problem with that even people like me cant be certain a reencode of mp4 will turn out a nice xvid all the time when if they did it direct from their source it works better
mp4s are not all equal.. although they may play
fine in VLC they may not convert well
==
what I meant
sadly some follow the pack and others like myself standout and stand firm
I have no issue if cappers make 720p mkvs but there
was no valid reason or reason to convert tv shows to mp4 that benefited the wholw..
their reason if dont like then convert it yourself.. the problem with that even people like me cant be certain a reencode of mp4 will turn out a nice xvid all the time when if they did it direct from their source it works better
mp4s are not all equal.. although they may play
fine in VLC they may not convert well
psspss at 2012-03-19 09:05 CET:
im using CBR ... instead of 2 pass which can reduce the bitrate
cbr may be smaller or bigger by a few extra mbs
dont botther me
all are set to 1000bit but i think the encoders has bugs and reduce it sometimes.. if it plays good and looks good on lappy its good enough for me
and so I share it as others want xvid
and if its 20 years old.. then that makes it well tested dont it.
I dont think oeple really care about the ongoign debate TNE.. they want it for older gear
cbr may be smaller or bigger by a few extra mbs
dont botther me
all are set to 1000bit but i think the encoders has bugs and reduce it sometimes.. if it plays good and looks good on lappy its good enough for me
and so I share it as others want xvid
and if its 20 years old.. then that makes it well tested dont it.
I dont think oeple really care about the ongoign debate TNE.. they want it for older gear
trialNerror at 2012-03-19 10:10 CET:
2 pass is meant to give you lower bitrate... where it's slow movement scenes... and higher bitrate where it's quicker motion frames. This will be way better looking than 1 pass CBR. Not saying you HAVE to do 2 pass, you can settle for so-so quality, but the 2 pass really does improve it.
Ah hah. Not debating. Freedom of expression. Explaining. You obviously didn't check the wiki links, either, or you would have seen x264 has been around for almost 10 years. Long enough to be tested through the ringers, wouldn't you say? Yep. Totally. It has been tested. Many times and even won numerous awards. Not debating, just explaining. Don't get it twisted.
I also don't see how "old gear" could even be brought up. Most people have an Xbox 360, or PS3, a ROKU or a WDMP (Western Digital Media Player); cell phones, tablet, netbook, laptop, desktop PC are all capable of playing the x264 AVC video with AAC audio and a brand new bluray player with AVC/AAC playback support is NOT that expensive.
There's no real legitimate reason to stick with XviD anymore. If you don't have any of the devices that support AVC/AAC, that's almost sad. C'mon, it's 2012. AVC/AAC is not state of the art brand new just came out a few months ago last year... so please stop acting like it is.
Those that insist XviD must stick around because of "old gear" is a very, VERY small crowd and that is why we who have moved on up to x264 really don't care if you can't get with the times.
Oh, by the way, not that anybody here gives a shit, but I did find the reason and a solution to the audio problems. All regular (not 720p) HDTV.x264-tNe.mp4's from now on will be PS3, X360, and many, many other device compliant.
Still hope they'll give you troubles when trying to convert them (-; because they really don't need converting since they play perfectly fine on everything I have which is similar to what most other people have.
Ah hah. Not debating. Freedom of expression. Explaining. You obviously didn't check the wiki links, either, or you would have seen x264 has been around for almost 10 years. Long enough to be tested through the ringers, wouldn't you say? Yep. Totally. It has been tested. Many times and even won numerous awards. Not debating, just explaining. Don't get it twisted.
I also don't see how "old gear" could even be brought up. Most people have an Xbox 360, or PS3, a ROKU or a WDMP (Western Digital Media Player); cell phones, tablet, netbook, laptop, desktop PC are all capable of playing the x264 AVC video with AAC audio and a brand new bluray player with AVC/AAC playback support is NOT that expensive.
There's no real legitimate reason to stick with XviD anymore. If you don't have any of the devices that support AVC/AAC, that's almost sad. C'mon, it's 2012. AVC/AAC is not state of the art brand new just came out a few months ago last year... so please stop acting like it is.
Those that insist XviD must stick around because of "old gear" is a very, VERY small crowd and that is why we who have moved on up to x264 really don't care if you can't get with the times.
Oh, by the way, not that anybody here gives a shit, but I did find the reason and a solution to the audio problems. All regular (not 720p) HDTV.x264-tNe.mp4's from now on will be PS3, X360, and many, many other device compliant.
Still hope they'll give you troubles when trying to convert them (-; because they really don't need converting since they play perfectly fine on everything I have which is similar to what most other people have.
psspss at 2012-03-19 11:07 CET:
well I googled web on 1st and 2nd pass
basically...they sad it dont always produce better results but doubles or more the conversion time
it has to do 2 pass so it can work out the average bit rate
to use on final encoding to get it to 350mb otr whatrever you choose
I dont think it matter about splits not if use CBR for video and sound..
so many use VBR which cause issues espc if
a video file becomes corrupted is my experience
making mp4 VBR is silly we talking about a few extra mb savings right.
the profile the soft chooses.. it works.. no point messing with it..
Im not after perfection just that it plays on stuff is good enough for me.. Im not competing with cappers etc.. just providing my stuff as they as for it.. h,mmm
basically...they sad it dont always produce better results but doubles or more the conversion time
it has to do 2 pass so it can work out the average bit rate
to use on final encoding to get it to 350mb otr whatrever you choose
I dont think it matter about splits not if use CBR for video and sound..
so many use VBR which cause issues espc if
a video file becomes corrupted is my experience
making mp4 VBR is silly we talking about a few extra mb savings right.
the profile the soft chooses.. it works.. no point messing with it..
Im not after perfection just that it plays on stuff is good enough for me.. Im not competing with cappers etc.. just providing my stuff as they as for it.. h,mmm
Comments